Tweet
Hellolol, visitor!
Article about dating a man 20 years older than you:
| Psychology Today Does the half-your-age-plus-7 rule work? Does it reflect people',s standards? Whether or not we apply it, we ought to know its strengths and limitations.
GO TO SITE
Who Is Too Young or Too Old for You to Date? Research finds that one well-known guideline may not work for everyone. Share on Bluesky. THE BASICS. The Science of Mating Take our Are You a Good First Date? Find a therapist near me. Key points. People often use the half-your-age-plus-7 rule" to determine the minimum socially acceptable age they can date — but this doesn't always work. In some cases, the results of the "half-your-age-plus-7 rule" doesn't reflect scientific evidence for age preferences. Men prefer a minimum age that's higher than the "half-your-age-plus-7 rule" would say is okay. What is the acceptable minimum age for a dating partner? When this question comes up in conversation, someone inevitably cites the half your age plus seven rule . This rule states that by dividing your own age by two and then adding seven you can find the socially acceptable minimum age of anyone you want to date. So if you’re a 24-year-old, you can feel free to be with anyone who is at least 19 (12 + 7) but not someone who is 18. 1 The (lesser-applied) other side of the rule defines a maximum age boundary: Take your age, subtract 7, and double it. So for a 24-year-old, the upper age limit would be 34 (17 * 2). With some quick math, the rule provides a minimum and maximum partner age based on your actual age that, if you choose to follow it, you can use to guide your dating decisions. A Chart of the Rule's Max and Min Partner Age Discrepancies Based on a Person's Actual Age. The utility of this equation? It lets you chart acceptable age discrepancies that adjust over the years. According to the rule, for example, a 30-year-old should be with a partner who is at least 22, while a 50-year-old’s dating partner must be at least 32 to not attract (presumed) social sanction. But how legitimate is this rule? Does it match our scientific understanding of age-related preferences for dating? Does it always apply? Should it ever? Let's examine it. How well does the rule reflect scientific evidence for age preferences? Researchers Buunk and colleagues (2000) asked men and women to identify the ages they would consider when evaluating someone for relationships of different levels of involvement. People reported distinct age preferences for marriage, a serious relationship, falling in love, casual sex, and sexual fantasies. Did they follow “the rule?" Based on the figures Buunk and colleagues (2000) provided (and thus the numbers are only informed approximations), I replotted their data superimposing the max and min age ranges defined by the half-your-age-plus-7 rule. Now we can see how well the rule corresponds with people’s reported acceptable ages. Men’s preferred minimum partner age: Let’s start with minimum age preferences reported by heterosexual men. In Figure 1, the solid black line represents the rule’s calculation for the minimum acceptable range. You can see that men are basically operating by the rule for minimum age preferences for marital relationships (blue bars) and serious dating relationships (yellow bars). Those age preferences consistently hover around the values denoted by the rule (the black line). If anything, in practice, men are more conservative when it comes to preferred marriage, preferring a minimum age higher than the rule would say is OK. Figure 1: Male Participants' Minimum Preferred Partner Age as Compared to the Rule. When it comes to sexual fantasies, however, men have minimum age preferences that are younger than the rule would designate appropriate. For example, this sample of 60-year-old men reports that it is acceptable to fantasize about women in their 20s, which the rule would say is unacceptable. But fantasies, of course, are not generally subject to public scrutiny and the rule is only designed to calculate what is socially acceptable in the public eye —so this discrepancy is not necessarily a failure of the rule. THE BASICS. The Science of Mating Take our Are You a Good First Date? Find a therapist near me. For rule-related involvement (relationships), 60-year-old men are stating that the minimum acceptable age is around 40, which does map much more closely to the rule’s predictions. Men’s preferred maximum partner age: The rule states that you can calculate maximum acceptable partner ages by subtracting seven from your own age and multiplying it by two.
Dating a man 20 years older than you
Article about dating a man 20 years older than you:
| Psychology Today Does the half-your-age-plus-7 rule work? Does it reflect people',s standards? Whether or not we apply it, we ought to know its strengths and limitations.
GO TO SITE
Who Is Too Young or Too Old for You to Date? Research finds that one well-known guideline may not work for everyone. Share on Bluesky. THE BASICS. The Science of Mating Take our Are You a Good First Date? Find a therapist near me. Key points. People often use the half-your-age-plus-7 rule" to determine the minimum socially acceptable age they can date — but this doesn't always work. In some cases, the results of the "half-your-age-plus-7 rule" doesn't reflect scientific evidence for age preferences. Men prefer a minimum age that's higher than the "half-your-age-plus-7 rule" would say is okay. What is the acceptable minimum age for a dating partner? When this question comes up in conversation, someone inevitably cites the half your age plus seven rule . This rule states that by dividing your own age by two and then adding seven you can find the socially acceptable minimum age of anyone you want to date. So if you’re a 24-year-old, you can feel free to be with anyone who is at least 19 (12 + 7) but not someone who is 18. 1 The (lesser-applied) other side of the rule defines a maximum age boundary: Take your age, subtract 7, and double it. So for a 24-year-old, the upper age limit would be 34 (17 * 2). With some quick math, the rule provides a minimum and maximum partner age based on your actual age that, if you choose to follow it, you can use to guide your dating decisions. A Chart of the Rule's Max and Min Partner Age Discrepancies Based on a Person's Actual Age. The utility of this equation? It lets you chart acceptable age discrepancies that adjust over the years. According to the rule, for example, a 30-year-old should be with a partner who is at least 22, while a 50-year-old’s dating partner must be at least 32 to not attract (presumed) social sanction. But how legitimate is this rule? Does it match our scientific understanding of age-related preferences for dating? Does it always apply? Should it ever? Let's examine it. How well does the rule reflect scientific evidence for age preferences? Researchers Buunk and colleagues (2000) asked men and women to identify the ages they would consider when evaluating someone for relationships of different levels of involvement. People reported distinct age preferences for marriage, a serious relationship, falling in love, casual sex, and sexual fantasies. Did they follow “the rule?" Based on the figures Buunk and colleagues (2000) provided (and thus the numbers are only informed approximations), I replotted their data superimposing the max and min age ranges defined by the half-your-age-plus-7 rule. Now we can see how well the rule corresponds with people’s reported acceptable ages. Men’s preferred minimum partner age: Let’s start with minimum age preferences reported by heterosexual men. In Figure 1, the solid black line represents the rule’s calculation for the minimum acceptable range. You can see that men are basically operating by the rule for minimum age preferences for marital relationships (blue bars) and serious dating relationships (yellow bars). Those age preferences consistently hover around the values denoted by the rule (the black line). If anything, in practice, men are more conservative when it comes to preferred marriage, preferring a minimum age higher than the rule would say is OK. Figure 1: Male Participants' Minimum Preferred Partner Age as Compared to the Rule. When it comes to sexual fantasies, however, men have minimum age preferences that are younger than the rule would designate appropriate. For example, this sample of 60-year-old men reports that it is acceptable to fantasize about women in their 20s, which the rule would say is unacceptable. But fantasies, of course, are not generally subject to public scrutiny and the rule is only designed to calculate what is socially acceptable in the public eye —so this discrepancy is not necessarily a failure of the rule. THE BASICS. The Science of Mating Take our Are You a Good First Date? Find a therapist near me. For rule-related involvement (relationships), 60-year-old men are stating that the minimum acceptable age is around 40, which does map much more closely to the rule’s predictions. Men’s preferred maximum partner age: The rule states that you can calculate maximum acceptable partner ages by subtracting seven from your own age and multiplying it by two.
Dating a man 20 years older than you